The MacMalcolm Dynasty (continued)
The division was not a straightforward one, of Celt against English. The first rival to Donald III was Duncan, the son of Malcolm III and Ingibjorg, who had been one of the earliest of the hostages held at the English court to secure his father's good behaviour. This naturalised macMalcolm, a convenient instrument of William Rufus's determination to close what would later be called the 'postern gate' in the north, was willing to swear fealty to a Norman king to secure an invasion force of French and English to unseat his uncle, which he did in May 1094.l2 Before the end of 1094, however, Duncan II was dead. He was a set of paradoxes - a Celt by birth who spent his long years as a hostage being trained as a Norman knight, whose seal represented him on horseback wearing the conical Norman helmet, yet buried like kings of Scots before him (except for his father) on lona. He was the victim of an alliance forged between Donald Ban, who had been brought up in the Celtic environment of the Western Isles, and Edmund, the third son of Margaret and an emblem of the alien influences at the royal court in the 1170s and 1180s. The reign of Donald III, with Edmund perhaps installed as designatus (successor) to the sixty-year-old king, lasted a further three years. In 1097 a second army was sent north by William Rufus, this time with Edgar, Margaret's third son, as pretender. It is likely, from the evidence of a charter granted by him to the Priory of Durham in August 1095, that Edgar had some control over at least the valley of the Tweed by then. Although installed as king 'in fealty to King William' in 1097 and acknowledged by Constantine of the kin of MacDuff, the most important of the native Scottish families who would play a role in royal inaugurations of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, Edgar (1097-1107) did not feel secure until Donald Ban was captured in 1099. Donald ended his years a blind and hapless captive but still of sufficient stature to be buried on Iona; Edmund, in disgrace, spent the rest of his days as a Cluniac monk.
In one sense, the 1090s marked a severe crisis of the MacMalcolm succession. It was resolved only by a combination of the most predictable twist in the dangerous game of power politics which Malcolm had been playing throughout much of his reign-the descent of Scotland into a client state of England - and the least likely of dynastic scenarios - the succession, one after another, of Malcolm's three youngest sons by Margaret. In another sense, each episode in the complex wranglings between 1093 and 1099 represented some effort to reconcile the clash of the two Cultures which permeated the royal house and its court. Duncan II had been accepted only 'on condition that he should never again introduce English or French into the land'. Edgar made no such promise. Yet even he, described as being 'like in all things' to Edward the Confessor (who was his mother's great uncle) and often taken as the very model of a Scoto-Norman king, was careful to establish his main residence not in Lothian but in Scotia, at Invergowrie on Tay.
There are dangers, too, in the pursuit of history as the cult of personality. The differences between Malcolm and Margaret are sometimes taken as a convenient symbol of the clash between 'a man who held back time by his own existence' and a woman who consciously instigated changes 'of fundamental, far-reaching significance'. It is too easy to describe the reign as a struggle between yesterday's man and tomorrow's woman. Only a long elapse of time and a calculated rewriting of history in the thirteenth century, when Margaret was elevated to a new stature, gave history to the 'progressives'. Similarly, the history of late eleventh- and twelfth-century Scotland cannot be told as a one-way traffic of the 'Normanisation' of native institutions, law and culture. Influences moved in both directions. Two dynamic cultures, Celtic and Anglo-Norman, were becoming increasingly intermingled (and therefore more difficult to distinguish) during an age of rapid change. It is, in a sense, the story of the ninth century repeated, with different actors: Scottish society, like kingship itself, was a crucible. Each reign in the 150 years which separated the reigns of Edgar and Alexander III represented a different attempt to strike a balance between old and new.
You can find more Scottish history here.
|