Peoples of the Kingdom Part Two
A series of obscure clues - early cultivated terraces revealed by place-names or aerial photography - suggest a pattern of intensive land clearance in the later Dark Ages. It is unlikely that the 400-year development of Pictish kingship was not paralleled in patterns of changing human settlement and farming. There are oblique implications, which would make sense in terms of the political consolidation of Scotland's early peoples, of a downhill movement of settlement from land above 600 - 700 feet barrier; these also imply an extension of agriculture from pastoral into arable. It is tempting to enter the hazardous terrain of place-names and explore the significance of the 300 or so places which can be shown to carry the Pictish word pett- or pit- (like Pitcapel or Pitfour) or even commoner incidence of place names with the later Gaelic element baile (such as Balgreen or Baldinnie), but it is sufficient to note that these and a number of other place-name elements all suggest farming. There are considerable difficulties in dating such evidence, but three general patterns seem likely: there was fairly extensive early clearance, which in some cases (such as that of Bloak Moss in Ayrshire) might be dated from as early as the fifth century; there were extensive clearances of forests; and a marked development of arable farming is suggested by the emergence of a fiscal system which with its emphasis on units of land which could easily be subdivided such as the davoch, carucate or ploughgate, and arachor, had an eye on the amount of ground which could be ploughed as well as on the number of animals which could be reared.
It is likely, too that in more fertile regions such a Lothian and the Merse the pace of clearance was quickening by the tenth and eleventh centuries. In Berwickshire, the grant by Edgar (1097-1107) of Old Cambus, which already has a mill must have been of largely arable ground although it contained within its bounds place-names with a Scandinavian element such a -dale (valley) and -law (hill), which are more precisely dateable to the tenth century once Scandinavian influence had impressed itself into northern English speech; here was land which must have been converted to arable within the previous century or so. The pattern and rhythms of farming were probably much the same in 1300 as in 1000 or even 800. The underlying feature is of the continuity of settlement. Prime sites, like the Upper Tweeddale valley, had probably been staked out many centuries before 1100. Feudal settlement enlarged townships, filled in waste (which can mean moss, moor or wood), and extended the arable infield; but especially in fertile areas like Lothian, these were usually not self-contained blocks of land but scattered strips, sometimes miles apart. Like earlier Viking settlers in Orkney, the evidence is not that the incomers pushed natives off the good land but rather that they tended to take up land which had hitherto lain uncultivated. The emphasis on arable land would also suggest that the population increase which marked the twelfth and thirteenth centuries had already begun before 1100. The exact population of Scotland in 1100, 1200, 1300 can only be guessed at; two recent estimates for its level about 1300 have ranged from half a million to one million. The precise level is however, less important than the undoubted fact that it as increasing.
|