Reign of Kenneth mac Alpin (continued)
What, if anything, marked out the reign of Kenneth mac Alpin from those
which went before it? The Scottish Chronicle recorded, though in vague terms,
that he invaded Lothian or 'Saxonia' fully six times; it also described how
the Britons raided as far east as Dunblane and the Danes as far north as
Dunkeld. Clearly Kenneth did not bring a new peace in his time. Even though
the bulk of his attention seems to have focused on his southern frontier,
there are indications, too, that he experienced trouble in the north. It was
only after his reign, according to a note in the Latin king-list of Dalriada,
that the reign of the Scots was transferred to the land of the Picts, centred
at Forteviot. His own authority, it has been suggested, was acknowledged at
most only in the four Pictish provinces south of the Mounth: in Fortriu
itself, and in Fife, Atholl and Circenn. Although he was claimed to be King
of all the Picts, his sphere of influence was no greater than that of most
kings of Picts in the century before him, and considerably less than that of
Constantine (789-820) or Óengus (820-34), whose reigns marked the golden age
of the Pictish kingdom of Fortriu and perhaps also the peak of Dalriadic
migration eastward. The three provinces north of the Mounth - Ce (Mar and Buchan),
Fidach (Moray and Ross), and Cait (Caithness and south-east Sutherland) - may
have been drifting out of the hands of the kingdom of Fortriu in the reign of
Kenneth as part of an internal family struggle involving rivals from the
Cenčl Loairn. Though perhaps not yet damaging to Fortriu authority, it was
the beginning of a process which would severely test mac Alpin kings in the
century after 950. Here was, it seems, an ambitious and ruthless warlord,
but not an overly successful one. Nor does he cut a very convincing figure
as a national hero, even of legend, in the traditional role of defender of
his people. It has plausibly been suggested that both Kenneth's rise to power
in Dalriada in the 830s and his difficult consolidation of his authority in
the Pictish kingdom after 842 rested on an alliance forged between him and
Gothfrith, a king of the Hebrides, whose Norse name suggests that he, like
Somerled after him, probably had mixed Scandinavian and Celtic ancestry.
Yet power lies as much in the eye of the subject as in the grip of a
king, and nowhere more so than in early Scotland; as an early Gaelic law
tract said, 'the people make the king'. It has been suggested that Kenneth's
reign may have seen a revival of the claim to high kingship first made in the
sixth century. Certainly it saw a number of gestures made which may have lent
a new aura to Pictish kingship. In 849 the relics of Columba, patron saint
of Dalriada but also saint-in-waiting of the Pictish Church, were moved
eastward to Dunkeld. It is unclear whether Kenneth founded a new religious
centre there or merely completed the work of Constantine begun half a century
earlier, but the activity centred on Dunkeld probably marked an increase in
the king's influence in Atholl. In the Irish Synchronisms, Kenneth is said
to have been the first to possess, not the kingdom of Scots, but the kingdom
of Scone and it is in his reign that Scone, which may have been the base of
the kingdom of Fortriu and perhaps also the place of inauguration of its
kings, seems to have been deliberately cultivated anew as a holy royal
centre. The foundations of the eternal triangle, which supported Scottish kingship throughout much of the medieval period, were now laid, but none of them, it is likely, belongs to the reign of the 6rst of the mac Alpin kings. St Andrews, the spiritual home of the kingdom, had acquired a new status at least a century earlier when it had been assigned a biblical saint; Dunkeld, whose venerated Celtic saint
would act as a counterbalance to the cult of Andrew, had been first developed
as a religious shrine by Constantine; but Scone, scene of a significant
battle in Pictish history in 728, described as a 'royal monastery' in 906 and
built next to a 'hill of Faith', would become the hub of the mac Alpin
dynasty.
What was new about the reign of Kenneth and his successor Donald may
have been a careful cultivation of the old. Scone and Dunkeld, existing
centres of royal and ecclesiastical authority, were given enhanced status.
It would not have been a surprising posture for a usurper to take.
There is one further clue to this, one of the most mysterious of all reigns
in Scottish history. A thirteenth-century source refers to the 'laws of mac
Alpin'. What this body of laws contained is unknown. If they existed,
their content would have been less important than the act of their
promulgation: the notions of a true king and a civilised people would both
have been embraced by the 'laws of mac Alpin'. It would have been another
gesture, but such gestures were important in early kingship. Another
symbolic token, which cannot be proved with any certainty, would have been,
as some have suggested, the bringing to Scone of the Stone of Destiny.
That inauguration stone would have fitted well into the established rites
of inauguration, which marked the marriage of the king to the land and the
people he ruled; the proclamation of a law code in the king's name would
have renewed the marriage. As with Columba, so with Kenneth: the man and
the cult need to be separated.
|