|
A' Cur Cùl ris an Dùthchas
"Clanship, Commerce and the House of Stuart 1603-1788" le Ailean
MacAonghais; Tuckwell Press, Beurla, £16.99 bog |
Neglecting the Clan Lands
"Clanship, Commerce and the House of Stuart 1603-1788" by Allan
Macinnes; Tuckwell Press, English, £16.99 paperback |
| San leabhar seo tha Proifeasair na h Eachdraidh aig Oilthigh Obar
Dheathain a' sgrùdadh fear dhe na h amannan as iom-fhillte doilleire ann
an eachdraidh na Gàidhealtachd. A dh'aindeoin an tiotail, chan eil ann
an co-cheangal saoghal na Gàidhlig ris na Stiùbhartaich ach fo-sgeul
chudromach dhen phrìomh sgeòil, 'se sin mar a chaidh urraidhean na fine
Gàidhealaich bho bhith nan ceannardan treubha gu bhith nan uachdarain
choimeirsealta. |
In this book, the Professor of History at Aberdeen University surveys
one of the most complex and challenging periods in Highland history. In
spite of the title, the relationship of Gaeldom with the Stuarts is more
of an essential subtext to the main theme, the transformation of the
Highland clan elite from tribal leaders to commercial landowners. |
| Tha Proif MacAonghais a' tòiseachadh le tuairisgeul air an t seann
chaidreabh Ghàidhealach, gu h àraid air an fhine a tha, aig bun dha
rèir-san, na chomann tìreil de bhuidhnean cinnidh a tharraing còmhla
airson co-dhìon tro ghnìomharan a' chinn-fhine is nam prìomh uaislean -
seòrsa de chlas gaisgeil curanta. Tha e a' cur rir n eòlas le dà
bheachd-smaoin air gleidheadh fearainn ris an can e "dùthchas" agus
"oighreachd". |
Prof Macinnes begins with a description of traditional social
organisation in Gaeldom, focusing on "the clan" which he characterises
as essentially a territorial association of kin-based groups, brought
together for the purposes of mutual protection through the agency of the
chief and leading gentry - a sort of heroic warrior class. His
contribution is to identify two concepts of territorial claim, what he
describes as "dùthchas" and "oighreachd". |
| Tha e a' mìneachadh "dùthchas" mar nàdar de dh'urrasaireachd dhualach a
bh'aig uarraidhean na fine air tìr na fine do mhath na buidhne. Dhàsan
'se as ciall do "dh'oighreachd" ach còir dhualach fhiùdalach air
fearann, còir a bha tighinn bho thùs bho chùmhnant a' Chrùin. Tha e a'
dèanamh dheth gur e neo-ionannachd fearann an dùthchais agus fearann na
h oighreachd a b'adhbhar do thòrr dhen aimhreit ann an co-dhiù an 17
linn. Barrachd is barrachd 'se an oighreachd seachd an dùthchas a bha
cudromach do dh'urraidhean na fine, oir b'e an oighreachd a mhàin a
dh'fhaodar cleachdadh airson buannachd choimeirsealta. |
"Dùthchas" he defines as a sort of inherited trusteeship which the clan
elite exercised over the clan territory for the mutual advantage of the
group. "Oighreachd" he treats as the inherited feudal title to estates,
a title that was ultimately derived through a Crown charter. He argues
that much of the instability of the 17th century at least is due to the
fact that the territories over which the clan elite exercised dùthchas
and those which comprised their oighreachd did not overlap.
Increasingly, it is oighreachd rather than dùthchas that is important to
the clan elite, because only oighreachd could serve as a basis for
commercial exploitation. |
| Tha MacAonghais a' cur an aghaidh na barail gur ann an lorg Chùil Lodair
as mò a ghabh an tionndadh bho cheann-cinnidh gu uachdaran coimeirsealta
àite. 'Se bh'ann, dha rèir, ach atharrachadh a thòisich co-dhiù tràth
san t 17 linn. 'Sann ri linn Sheumais VI a chaidh oidhirp dha-rìribh a
dhèanamh leis a' Chrùn gus na h urraidhean fine a dhèanamh nan
uachdarain Bhreatannach, agus tha e dhen bheachd gum bu chòir coimhead
air Reachdan I gu h àraidh mar phàirt dhe seo seach mar ionnsaigh
ladarna air cultar na Gàidhlig mar a bhios cuid a' cumail a mach. |
Prof Macinnes challenges the view that this process of transformation of
clan chief to commercial landlord occurred primarily in the wake of
Culloden. Instead, he argues, this process dates at least to the early
17th century. It is during the reign of James VI that serious efforts
are made by the Crown to transform the clan elite into members of the
British landed classes, and he argues that the Statutes of Iona should
be interpreted primarily in this light, rather than being seen as the
frontal attack on Gaelic culture they are sometimes portrayed to be. |
| Bha aig na h urraidhean fine ri tòiseachadh air coimhead air
gnothaichean coimeirsealta seach riaghladh fearainn traidiseanta, a bha
do mhath na fine air fad, ri linn cron Cogaidhean Mhontròis sna 1640n,
is iad a' fàgail nan urraidhean fo fhiachan a bha càrnadh suas. Cha
deach an t aomadh seo ach a dhaingneachadh le fàs na fèille air crodh
anmoch san t 17 linn agus leis an dròbhadh de bhuair mhòra a thàinig na
chois. |
The destructive effects of the Montrose wars of the 1640s which led to
accumulating debts among the clan elites forced those elites to begin to
consider commercial alternatives to the traditional basis of estate
management, aimed as it was at the maintenance of the clan as a whole.
The expansion of the market for cattle in the late 17th century and the
resulting development of large scale cattle droving only reinforced
these trends. |
| Fiachan a' sìor shreap, urraidhean a bha na bu trice bho bhaile agus a'
fàs na bu chleachdte ri beatha baile is cùirte ann an Dun Eideann is
Lunnainn, agus màl a bhiodh a' dìreadh; bha iad uile a' fosgladh
sgàinidhean sòisealta am broinn na fine. Ach ma tha MacAonghais ag ràdh,
fhuair am bruthadh furtachd agus nàdar de fhreagairt tro Sheumasachd.
'Se bh'ann an Cùil Lodair agus na thàinig na lorg, a rèist, ach an ceum
mu dheireadh agus chan b'e a' chiad cheum air an t slighe gu cleachdadh
coimeirsealta tìr na fine. |
Spiralling debts, increasing absences of clan elites who increasingly
came to identify with the urban and courtly life of Edinburgh and
London, and upward pressures on rents all created social pressures
within the clan. As Prof Macinnes suggests, however, such tensions found
an outlet and something of a resolution in Jacobitism. Culloden and its
aftermath, then, are the final and not the first step in the process by
which clan lands are given over to commercial exploitation. |
| Gun teagamh tha an leabhar seo aig MacAonghais glè chuideachail ann a
bhith a' dèanamh ciall dhe na feartan eaconamach a thug uiread a bhuaidh
air eachdraidh an ama. Gu sònraichte inntinneach tha an sgrùdadh aige
dhe na leasachaidhean coimeirsealta an dèidh Aiseag an Rìgh an 1660. Ach
tha mòran dhen argamaid stèidhte air na bha gabhail àite air fearann
Sìol Dhiarmaid an Earra Ghàidheal. Air an iompachadh tràth gu
Clèireachd, gu Cuigseachd agus gu prionnsabalan coimeirsealta ann an
riaghladh fearainn, chan eil e soilleir gun ionann na Caimbeulaich ris
a' chòrr dhen Ghàidhealtachd. |
Without question, Prof Macinnes' book provides valuable insights into
the economic forces which helped to produce significant changes in the
period he studies. In particular, his analysis of commercial
developments after the Restoration in 1660 is most interesting. Yet much
of this discussion is based on events taking place on Campbell lands in
Argyll. Early converts to Presbyterianism, Whiggism and the application
of commercial principles to estate management, it is not at all clear
that these Campbells are fully representative of wider Gaeldom.
|
| Tha MacAonghais a' togail fianais eaconamach is eile ann a bhith a' cur
an aghaidh a' bheachd gun robh na fineachan cogail fòirneartach
neo-laghail san t 17 linn is tràth san 18 linn. Tha e a' dèanamh
argamaid mhath gun robh is gu bheil na beachdan seo thar na còrach, gu
ìre air an sgaoileadh leis a' Chrùn agus le Goill aig am biodh buannachd
maoine ann a bhith a' cumail gnàth-bharail a' dol. Tha e a' nochdadh gum
b'e polasaidh an riaghaltais fhèin gu ìre mhòr a bu choireach do na
bh'ann de dh'aimhreit air a' Ghàidhealtachd. |
Prof Macinnes uses economic and other evidence to challenge the notion
that the clans were militaristic, violent and lawless during the 17th
and early 18th centuries. He argues, convincingly, that such claims were
and are overstated, in part the fabrication of the Crown and others
outside of Gaeldom who had a material interest in perpetuating a
stereotype. He shows that such instability as existed in Gaeldom was in
no small part due to government policy itself. |
| 'Se aon mhearachd mhòr a tha san leabhar an dòigh chumhang sa bheil e a'
rannsachadh atharrachadh cultarach is cànanach nan urraidhean fine aig
an àm; cha robh am filleadh a steach do ghnàth-bheatha Bhreatainn na
chùis eaconamach a mhàin ach cuideachd cultarach. Chan eil an tionndadh
bho chaidreabh treubhach gu caidreabh stèidhte air prionnsabalan
coimeirsealta an còmhnaidh a' tachairt le tul-thionndadh cultarach is
cànanach na chois; dè na feartan sònraichte a bha toirt buaidh air a'
Ghàidhealtachd a b'adhbhar dha seo? |
One serious criticism of the book is its limited treatment of the
broader cultural and linguistic shift that took place amongst the clan
elite during the period; this was not only a process of economic
integration into the British mainstream, but also a cultural one.
Transformation from a social organisation based on tribalism to one
based on commercial principles is not always accompanied by
comprehensive cultural and linguistic shifts; what were the special
factors affecting Gaeldom that explain this? |
| Mar sin, mar eisimpleir, ged a tha MacAonghais a' bruidhinn tòrr mu na h
atharraichean ann an riaghladh fearainn a chaidh an cur an gnìomh leis
na Caimbeulaich am meadhan is deireadh na 17 linn, chan eil mòran
sgrùdadh air na h atharraichean cultarach a bha gabhail àite nam measg
aig an àm. Bha na h urraidhean seo a' gleidheadh bàird chùirte, Clann
MhicEòghainn, a bha dèanamh fiù sna 1630n bàrdachd Chlasaigeach le
cuspairean annasach ùra a' nochdadh barail nodha urraidhean an ama. Dè
dh'èirich gus na leasachaidhean inntinneach cultarach seo a chur gu
neoini agus carson? Chan eil a' chùis bhunaiteach seo ga sgrùdadh. |
So, for example, while Prof Macinnes discusses at length the changes in
estate management implemented by the Campbells of Argyll in the mid to
late 17th century, there is little analysis of the cultural change
taking place in this particular clan elite at the same time. These same
Campbells retained court poets, the MacEwens, who were even in the 1630s
producing Classical verse with startling new motifs which reflected some
of the new values imbuing the clan elite at this time. What happened to
derail these interesting cultural developments, and why? These
fundamental issues are not addressed. |
| Mar an ceudna tha MacAonghais a' cumail a mach nach ann air na bàird
chùirte a bha cronachadh Reachdan I ag amas ach air "Cliar Sheanachain",
na còmhlain allabanach de dh'fhilidhean. Ach chan eil mìneachadh no
sgrùdadh aige air carson a dh'fhalbh bàrdachd chùirte aig an àm seo, gun
luaidh air an sgoilearachd nach robh ri fhaighinn ach am measg luchd
foghlaim is litreachais na Gàidhlig. |
Similarly, Prof Macinnes makes the claim that strictures in the Statutes
of Iona were directed not so much at the court poets but at the
wandering minstrel bands, the "Cliar Sheanachain". He fails, however, to
explain or analyse the reasons that do underlie the demise in this
period of court poetry or of the broader Gaelic learning that was the
preserve of the disappearing Gaelic learned orders and literati. |
| 'Se duilgheadas eile mar a bhios an t ùghdar a' cur feum air
briathrachas is bàrdachd Ghàidhlig. Ann a bhith a' deasbad dàimhealachd
shòisealta na Gàidhlig, mar eisimpleir, tha MacAonghais a' cleachdadh is
a' mìneachadh mòran bhriathran Gàidhlig. Gu mì-fhortanach, tha iomadh
tuar cèille aig facail leithid "fine", "dùthchas", "uachdaran" is eile.
'Se pròiseact air leth inntinneach a ghealladh soillse mhòr a bhiodh ann
an sgrùdadh dhe na briathran seo ann an sgrìobhainnean Gàidhlig thar
tìme. Mar an ceudna, ged a tha bàrdachd Ghàidhlig uaireannan ga
cleachdadh gu math, tha i dìreach a' cur solas air cùisean eaconamach is
tionndadh sòisealta gun sgrùdadh mionaideach ann. |
Another problem is the author's use of Gaelic terminology and Gaelic
poetry. In his discussion of traditional social relationships in
Gaeldom, for example, Prof Macinnes uses and interprets many Gaelic
terms. Unfortunately, words such as "fine", "dùthchas", "uachdaran" and
so forth have many shades of meaning. An analysis of the uses of these
terms in Gaelic sources over an extended period would be an extremely
interesting project and might render considerable insights. Similarly,
while Gaelic poetry is sometimes used to good effect, it is primarily to
illustrate the points made about economic and social transformation
without a more systematic analysis. |
| 'Se as coltach gun deach tòrr sgoilearachd is comhairle bho eòlaichean
Ceiltis fhàgail a thaobh, agus cha bu chòir Gàidhlig a bhith ga
cleachdadh ann an leabhraichean mura 's urrainnear a dhèanamh ceart neo
neach-deasachaidh math le Gàidhlig fhaighinn. Chan fhaigheadh comharra
san deuchainn as fhasa airson "An Gaidhealtachd" no "uachadaran", mar
eisimpleir! |
Much valuable scholarship and advice of Celticists seems to have been
left aside, and a piece of advice to those who wish to use Gaelic in
books such as this would be to do it properly, or get a competent Gaelic
editor. One would get no marks in even the most basic of exams for "An
Gaidhealtachd" and "uachadaran", for example! |
| Sin ann no às, tha MacAonghais air toirt dhuinn sgrùdadh de dh'àm
dhoilleir ann an eachdraidh na Gàidhealtachd a tha feumail is
inntinneach agus, coltach ri leabhraichean Mhic an t Sealgair air an 19
linn is an 20mh, tha e a' cur gu mòr rir n eòlas agus gar stiùireadh gu
tuilleadh leughaidh is sgoilearachd. |
Nonetheless, Prof Macinnes has provided us with a useful and interesting
survey of a most difficult period in Highland history, and like James
Hunter's books on the 19th and 20th centuries, is a valuable
contribution in itself and a starting point for further reading and
scholarship. |
Rob Dunbar