|
| Bàrdachd is Bomaichean
|
Poetry and Bombs
|
|
Am bi fuasgladh ann a tha na cheartas no na
dhioghaltas airson nam mìle a chaochail air 11
Sultain?
|
Will there be a resolution that represents justice or
revenge for the thousands that died on September
11th?
|
|
Ri àm sgrìobhaidh a’ phìos seo chan eil
fuasgladh san amharc sa “chogadh” an aghaidh
Afganastain. ’S mathaid nach bi fuasgladh ann
idir, ’s e sin fuasgladh a bheir biadh is sìth is
seasmhachd dha muinntir Afganastain co-dhiù.
Agus, am bi fuasgladh ann a tha na cheartas (no
na dhioghaltas?) airson nam mìle a chaochail
air 11 Sultain?
|
At the time of writing this piece there is no
resolution in sight in the “war” against Afghanistan.
Perhaps there won’t be a resolution, that is, a
resolution that will bring food and peace and
stability to the population of Afghanistan. And, will
there be a resolution that represents justice (or
revenge?) for the thousands that died on
September 11th?
|
|
Chan eil teagamh nach eil na Stàitean
Aonaichte daingeann nuair a tha ceann amais
sònraichte aca ri thoirt gu buil. Nach b’ fhad an
t-sìde a ghabh iad an casan a thoirt leotha à
Bhìatnam? Agus nach b’ iad a thug cogadh “fo
na mùdan” air dùthchannan mar Nicaragua,
Chile, El Salvador, Colombia agus Cuba fad
bliadhnaichean mòra? Tha e na ìoranas gun
robh e na chleachdadh aca a bhith a cumail
airgead, oideachadh cog-aidh is armachd dha
riaghaltasan coirbte is còmh-lain
cheannairceach na làimhe deise.
|
There is no doubt about the determination of the
United States when they have a special objective
to fulfil. Didn’t they take their time packing their
bags to leave Vietnam? And wasn’t it they who
waged “covert” war on countries such as Nicaragua,
Chile, El Salvador, Colombia and Cuba for years
on end? It is an irony that it was their habit to
supply money, military training and arms to corrupt
governments and right-wing terrorist groups.
|
| Thathar ag ràdh gu bheil eachdraidh mhoiteil
cogaidh aig na h-Albannaich agus gu h-àraid
aig na Gaidheil. Tha fhios gum bu dual dhuinn
cath a chur air a chèile. Chan iad na fineachan
bho thuath a-mhàin a bha ri creachadh is murt,
ach na “comhlain ealltainn” a ghabh dha càch a
chèile air sràidean Ghlaschu. ’S fìor cuideachd
gun deach ar cleachdadh is ar caitheamh air
sgàth dùthchannan ris nach robh gnothaich
againn. Ach gu tric thèid dearmad a dhèanamh
air seo.
|
It is said that the Scots, and in particular the Gaels,
have a proud history of war. Certainly it was
customary for us to make war on each other. It
wasn’t only the northern clans who used to plunder
and murder, but the “razor gangs” who would go for
each other’s throats on the streets of Glasgow. True
also that we were used and spent for the sake of
countries with which we had no quarrel. But this is
often overlooked.
|
|
Rinn Iain Prebble obair ionmholta air a’ chùis
seo na leabhair Rebellion a tha a’ dearbhadh
nach robh na Gaidheil gu lèir deònach bàs
fhaighinn gun adhbhar agus gun d’rinn iad
seasamh na aghaidh. Ach tha fianais ann
cuideachd bho na bàird againn, agus ar leam
gum biodh e iomchaidh sùil a thoirt, sa chiad
dol a-mach, air Deòrsa Mac Iain Deòrsa.
|
John Prebble did excellent work on this subject in
his book Rebellion that proves that not all Gaels
were willing to die without good cause and that
they took a stand against it. But there is also
evidence from our own bards, and I think it fitting
that we look, in the first instance, at George
Campbell Hay.
|
| Aig toiseach an dàrna cogaidh bha e den
bheachd gun robh na bomaichean a thuit air
Sasainn mar cheannachd air “na goireasan,
beartas, cliù is onair” a bha na Sasannaich air
an goid bho dhùthchannan eile. Mar sgàthan air
na tha a’ tachairt an-dràsta, chaidh dèanamh
dheth gun robh “sàr chumhachd” a’ buain na bha
iad air cur. Dhiùlt Mac Iain Deòrsa pàirt a
ghabhail sa chogadh agus theich e gu
garbh-chrìochan Earra Ghaidheal, far an deach
a chleith leis na cnuic is na coilltean fad naoi
mìosan tro shìde dhubh a’ gheamhraidh. Cha b’
ann nach robh fuath aige dha Hitler, ach nach
robh e airson “sàr chumhachd choirbte” mar
Sasainn a dhìon. Mu dheireadh thall rug na
poileis air agus chaidh a chur a shabaid.
|
At the start of the second world war he was of the
opinion that the bombs that fell on England were
just reward for the “resources, wealth, fame and
honour” that the English had stolen from other
nations. In a reflection of what is happening at the
moment, it was considered that a “superpower” was
reaping what it had sown. George Campbell Hay
refused to take any part in the war and he fled to
the highlands of Argyll, where the hills and woods
kept him hidden for nine months through the dark
wintertime. He certainly hated Hitler, but he had
no wish to defend a “corrupt superpower” like
England. Eventually the police caught up with him
and he was sent to fight.
|
|
| Thàinig am beachd seo am bàrr sa bhàrdachd
aig Murchadh MacPhàrlain cuideachd. Bha
esan fo chuthach gun robh na h-aon daoine a
rinn sgrios air na Gaidheil a-nis an dùil gum
biodh na bha air fhàgail dhiubh deònach a
bhith a’ sabaid air an sgàth. Thuirt Bàrd
Mhealboist san dàn aige “An Deis Odhar”:
|
This thought surfaced too in the poetry of
Murchadh MacPhàrlain. He was angered that the
same people who decimated the Gael now
expected what was left of them to fight on their
behalf. In his poem “An Deis Odhar”, the Melbost
Bard said:
|
|
| Hitler gheall e Lebensraum
dha shluagh ma gheibh e bhuaidh;
Cha b’ ionnan sin ’s na Hitleran
A bhris spiorad mo shluaigh;
Na Hitleran breun Breatannach
A mhurt mo thìr mu thuath
Gu Lebensraum do chaoraich,
Is na daoine sgiùrs’ thar chuan
|
Hitler promised Lebensraum
to his people if they gained victory;
Not the same is that and the Hitlers
That broke my people’s spirit;
The filthy British Hitlers
That murdered my northern land
to Lebensraum your sheep,
and the people scattered overseas
|
|
| Cha robh bàrdachd Mhic Iain Deòrsa agus
MhicPhàrlain gun bhrìgh. ’S iad seo daoine a
bha thall ’s a chunnaic. Thàinig bàrdachd
chumhachdach is beachdan cruaidh bho na
chunnaic iad de sgrios fuilteach air a’ bhlar. Mas
math m’ fhiosrachadh, rinn Seòras Bush a
dhìcheall gus seirbheis an airm a sheachnadh,
agus cha robh a-riamh taobh aig Tònaidh Blair
ri beatha an airm nas mò. Carson a-rèist a tha
iadsan cho deònach an tuilleadh bàis
adhbhrachadh?
|
The poetry of Campbell Hay and MacPhàrlain was
not without import. These men saw the war for
what it was. From what they witnessed of bloody
destruction on the battlefield came powerful verse
and uncompromising opinion. If I am correctly
informed, George Bush did his utmost to avoid
military service, and Tony Blair never showed any
inclination towards an army life either. Why then
are they so willing to cause yet more death?
|
|
| ’S fìor nach bu choir dhuinn na thachair air 11
Sultain a leigeil à cuimhne, ach cò as urrainn a
ràdh gu fìrinneach gum bi an saoghal na àite
nas fheàrr às dèidh na h-iomairt seo? Agus
muinntir Afganastain? ’S iad a bha fo dhaorsa
an Talabain a-nis le na ceudan marbh is leònte
le bomaichean Aimeireaga is Bhreatainn. Nach
iad a bhios taingeil sna bliadhnaich-ean ri
teachd? Agus am bi Blair deònach a-rithist
armachd a reic dha treubh seach treubh san
Afganastan ùr? A bharrachd air sin, cò tha
sireadh ceartais dha nam mìltean a chaochail
ann an Nicaragua is El Salvador aig
ceannaircich an CIA? Iomadh ceist – ach cò aig
a tha na freagairtean?
|
It’s right that we should not let the memory of what
happened on September 11 fade, but who can
honestly say that the world will be a better place
after this campaign? And the people of
Afghanistan? Those who were once under the
tyranny of the Taleban now with hundreds dead
and wounded by British and American bombs.
Won’t they be thankful in the years to come? And
will Blair once again be willing to sells arms to
each and every tribe in the new Afghanistan?
Moreover, who is seeking justice for the thousands
who died in Nicaragua and El Salvador because of
CIA-backed terrorists? Many questions – but who
has the answers?
|
|
| Bho làithean m’ òige tha cuimhne agam gun
deach innse dhomh gum b’ e fòirneart an rathad
ceàrr gus cùisean fhuasgladh eadar dithis. Bho
na tha mi a’ mothachadh ann am foghlam an
latha an-diugh, tha seo fhathast fìor. Air an aon
dòigh, tha mi den bheachd nach bu choir
dhuinn armachd a reic no a chumail ri
buidhnean is riaghaltasan coirbte sa chiad dol
a-mach. Rinneadh Bin Laden, an Talaban agus
Saddam Hussein le airgead is miann
Aimeireaganach is Breatannach. Rinn sinn
prothaid às. Buannachd eacona-mach is
poileataigeach sa bhad ach le ceannachd mhòr
aig a’ cheann thall. ’S dòcha gum bi cuid a
luchd obrach a’ dèanamh air an ionad obrach
agus nach bi uiread de dh’airg-ead bho na
companaidhean mòra armachd a’ dol gu
ionmhas a’ Phartaidh Làbaraich. Ach a bheil prìs
air sìth is beatha?
|
As a youngster I remember being told that violence
was the wrong way to settle a dispute between two
people. From what I am noticing in present day
education, this is still true. With the same
reasoning I believe that we shouldn’t sell or supply
arms to questionable governments or organisations
in the first place. Bin Laden, the Taleban and
Saddam Hussein were created with American and
British money and will. We made profit from it.
Political and economic gain in the short term but
with a heavy price to pay in the long run. Perhaps
some workers will be heading for the job centre
and there won’t be the same financial support from
the arms companies to Labour Party funds. But
does life and peace have a price?
|
|
| A bharrachd air sin, b’ urrainn dhuinn an
t-airgead nach tèid a chosg air armachd a chur
gu ospadalan is sgoiltean. Agus Inbhe
Theàrainte dhan Ghàidhlig.
|
On top of that, the money that isn’t spent on arms
could go to hospitals and schools. And Secure
Status for Gaelic.
|
You can find more articles in the archive under